Between unkept promises and explosive reality, the migration issue presents itself as the breaking point for the Swiss model. In this interview, Pro Suisse gives voice to a widely felt unease: loss of control, pressure on infrastructure, and institutional drift. The \u00abNo to 10 Million Swiss\u00bb initiative on June 14th could well be the first nail in the coffin of the EU agreement for submission, which is nothing more than gradual accession through law and standards.<\/p>\n
Source :<\/strong> Interview with Stephan Rietiker in 24 Hours<\/em><\/p>\n Stephan Rietiker's analysis is based on a fact that more and more Swiss people are experiencing concretely: Rapid population growth puts direct pressure on the country<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Since 2000, Switzerland has gained nearly 2 million inhabitants<\/strong>, an unprecedented evolution. But above all, a key element must be remembered:<\/p>\n During debates on free movement, the Federal Council spoke of controlled flows of around 8,000 net entries per year<\/strong>.<\/p>\n \u2b95 The observed reality is quite different: around 75,000 net annual entries<\/strong> in recent years.<\/p>\n This massive discrepancy is not a mere forecasting error:<\/p>\n it's a major political breakdown of trust<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Concrete consequences:<\/p>\n \u00abChaos\u00bb used by Rietiker corresponds to a lived reality.<\/p>\n The proposal is clear:<\/p>\n \u00abTo welcome only those people we truly need.\u00bb<\/p><\/blockquote>\n With a budget of around 40,000 annual entries<\/strong>, Switzerland could:<\/p>\n It's not about closing Switzerland off, but about to put an end to uncontrolled and imposed immigration<\/strong>.<\/p>\n The current free movement precisely prevents this steering.<\/p>\n Rietiker highlights an often overlooked point:<\/p>\n \u00abCross-border workers are a lesser evil\u00bb<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Indeed, cross-border workers:<\/p>\n With about 380,000 cross-border workers<\/strong>, Switzerland already has a flexibility tool.<\/p>\n This distinction allows to To preserve the economy without worsening internal demographic pressure<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Rietiker rightly denounces the \u201cBilaterals III\u201d:<\/p>\n \u00abA blatant lie\u00bb<\/p><\/blockquote>\n These agreements involve:<\/p>\n \u2b95 We're moving from balanced agreements to a Progressive integration without membership voting<\/strong>.<\/p>\n The initiative thus constitutes a essential democratic stopping point<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Rietiker calls into question the idea of automatic alignment:<\/p>\n The more one aligns oneself with this system, the greater the risk of\u2019to import one's fragilities<\/strong>.<\/p>\n \u00abNeutrality does not equal cowardice\u00bb<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Swiss neutrality:<\/p>\n Diluting it would amount to weakening a historic pillar of Swiss prosperity.<\/p>\n The Pro Suisse project is structured around four axes:<\/p>\n The \u00abNo to 10 Million Swiss\u00bb initiative becomes a global strategic tool<\/strong>.<\/p>\n The interview with Stephan Rietiker in 24 Hours<\/em> highlights a fundamental reality:<\/p>\n The initial promises on immigration have not been met.<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Between the 8,000 entries announced<\/strong> and the 75,000 observed<\/strong>, the gap is such that it justifies a complete overhaul of the system.<\/p>\n Taking back control is no longer an ideological option, but a political necessity to restore Switzerland's trust, stability, and sovereignty<\/strong>.<\/p>\n \n <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Entre promesses non tenues et r\u00e9alit\u00e9 explosive, la question migratoire s\u2019impose comme le point de rupture du mod\u00e8le suisse. Dans cet entretien, Pro Suisse met des mots sur un malaise largement ressenti : perte de contr\u00f4le, pression sur les infrastructures et d\u00e9rive institutionnelle. L\u2019initiative \u00abNon \u00e0 une Suisse \u00e0 10 millions\u00bb le 14 juin pourrait […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1075,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politique-interieure","category-ue"],"yoast_head":"\nA finding that has become undeniable: uncontrolled migratory pressure<\/h3>\n
\n
Regaining control: a selective and sovereign immigration policy<\/h3>\n
\n
Cross-border workers: a pragmatic solution<\/h3>\n
\n
Agreements with the EU: a drift towards loss of sovereignty<\/h3>\n
\n
The EU: a partner, but not a model<\/h3>\n
\n
Neutrality: a strategic strength<\/h3>\n
\n
A coherent vision: sovereignty, stability, prosperity<\/h3>\n
\n
Conclusion<\/h3>\n