When those who claim to govern in the name of the people actually work to reduce their power, it is no longer a political disagreement \u2013 but a reversal of principle.<\/p>\n
While some are negotiating in the shadows for an ever-deeper integration into external structures, the constitutional basis remains clear and unambiguous: \u00abSovereignty in Switzerland belongs to the people and the cantons.\u00bb<\/p>\n
This sovereignty is not a slogan, however. It implies control, choice, the ability to say yes \u2013 but above all, to say no.<\/p>\n
Behind technocratic discourse and promises of \u2019harmonisation,\u201c a reality is emerging: transfer of powers, legal alignment, and the progressive dilution of popular will.<\/p>\n
This isn't a modernisation.
\nIt's a slip.<\/p>\n
And by digging away, some end up burying what makes Switzerland unique: a model where the citizen is not a spectator, but sovereign.<\/p>\n
The question is therefore not whether these agreements are \u201cpractical\u201d or \u201cnecessary\u201d.
\nThe real question is simple:<\/p>\n
Who still decides in Switzerland? \ud83c\udde8\ud83c\udded<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Quand ceux qui pr\u00e9tendent gouverner au nom du peuple travaillent en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 \u00e0 en r\u00e9duire le pouvoir, il ne s\u2019agit plus d\u2019un d\u00e9saccord politique \u2014 mais d\u2019un renversement de principe. Pendant que certains n\u00e9gocient dans l\u2019ombre une int\u00e9gration toujours plus pouss\u00e9e \u00e0 des structures ext\u00e9rieures, la base constitutionnelle, elle, reste claire et sans ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1068,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politique-interieure","category-ue"],"yoast_head":"\n